The Mysterious Forest. A Way to Retell a Story and Keep the Tense

Names and identifying details of every student here are changed, as they are everywhere on the blog.

I put an X on it for 2 years

Whenever a pupil put down The Lychoy walked (Leshiy khodil) in a place that called for Go ahead (poshyol), I would circle it and put the right form in the margin.

For 2 years I circled away while the same kids made the same error from one week to the next and there was no progress to be had. What escaped me was that you would hardly ever see the mistake in reverse. They were not mixing up the two forms so much as applying one to do the work of both, which is quite another matter and no red circle will remedy.

Why it seemed like teaching

A child with a single verb where Russian has two is not in error. He is operating a smaller system, and it holds up until it does not.

It gave something to show for the hour’s work. The parent saw the corrections on the page, I saw my effort reflected there, and come the next week the identical form would be returned to me unmarked.

I chalked it up to the difficulty of aspect, as it is difficult enough. It has a reputation for being the thing that puts learners off, so when one fails at it it is taken as the natural order rather than a sign to be heeded.

Then a boy who was good at Russian made me take notice. His reading was fine, he spoke with speed and in his narratives every past-tense verb was perfective. Not most of them. All of them.

To anyone listening there was nothing amiss with his Russian, and that was what was troubling. You can help a child who makes a mistake. One who makes none but is still doing something odd is a different sort of problem.

What the research has to say

Maria Polinsky looked at adult heritage speakers of low proficiency and found what put my red circles in a new light: the perfective-imperfective pairs are Not just weak, but absent, With only one member left to cover both meanings.

Anna Mikhaylova has done some work that makes the issue teachable. She shows that aspectual morphology can be as much a hindrance as a help to a learner’s comprehension, contingent on whether the meaning of the verb is in accord with its present form.

Oksana Laleko went a step further to account for my good reader. In her study of Covert restructuring she found high-proficiency heritage speakers to be indistinguishable from monolinguals to the ear even as their aspectual system had reorganized itself in quiet fashion.

Laleko’s data on distribution are the clearest for a teacher. Where a monolingual will use whatever the sentence requires, the heritage speaker in her figures lets the object have its say. With one type of object they are perfective 9 out of 10, with another imperfective almost without fail, on the very same verbs. In conversation the problem is hidden because a child whose form is dictated by the object sounds as if he is making a choice; you only know if you count.

The two forms

The distinction has not been lost, they have simply ceased to need it, which is more difficult to spot and to put right.

With the Russian past tense one must make a choice each time, and it has nothing to do with the timing of the event but its shape. Noticed (zamechal) is the imperfective and noticed (zametil) the perfective. Two forms of the same verb and the latter brings the event to a close: he noticed, once, and that is done. The sentence the plan puts in my hand is a case in point. The forest fairy walked for a long time in the forest, but suddenly noticed a light. (The Leshiy was walking in the forest for a while when he suddenly noticed a light.) I put one form on that list before I had a chance to check it and it does not act like the rest of them. Go away (poshyol) is perfective, but it completes the act of setting off as opposed to the walking itself, so it is not a match for went (fell) in the way noticed is for noticed. Russian verbs have their own system. Comparing "extend" and "point," the above sentence becomes meaningful.

Long and Suddenly It is they who are signaling. One word stretches the verb, the other reduces it to a point; a child will get most of what is required by reading for those two.

Verbs that have nothing to do with motion exhibit the same split. She wrote the letter all night long (ona pisala pis’mo ves’ vecher) means an evening was spent at it; she wrote the letter in the evening (she wrote the letter for the evening) is a letter that is now done.

Where you can hear the alternation

Parables and folktales are made of this from one end to the other and are far better at instructing in it than any table of endings. A long stretch sets the scene of someone living or waiting or searching. Then a perfective verb will break the stretch and the story pivots: she found, he noticed, they arrived. Put any Russian tale to the test by reading it out loud and you will find the break in the same spot. A child who has heard it 2 times is past the need for the rule to be put to him.

The boy with all-perfective narratives

The imperfective is the room, the perfective the door.

He turned in a page on his summer with 30 past-tense verbs. I went through and counted them that night, something I had never bothered to do with another’s work. 29 were perfective. The one imperfective was was (bylo), which has no aspectual partner of any consequence here and is not really a choice.

What he produced was a catalogue of completed events with no background to speak of. In English it would be clipped but passable. In Russian it was like a police report on one’s own holiday. We did not resort to rules to set it right. I took a paragraph of his and rewrote it twice, one version stretching everything and the other collapsing it. He could tell both were wrong and that was enough. The third version he put together himself during the week and I have kept it as the only page of a student’s Russian I ever have.

At Palme School we teach children online, in groups of up to eight, two forty-minute classes a week, and the first two lessons are free. Both courses above take bookings the same way, and the printable material is free whether or not you ever book anything.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ходил (khodil) and пошёл (poshyol)?

I went covers a stretch of walking with no endpoint. Go away completes the setting off rather than the walking, and Russian motion verbs run a system of their own.

My child’s Russian sounds fine. Could the aspect still be a problem?

Yes, and that is the common case. Research on high-proficiency heritage speakers found them indistinguishable from monolinguals while the aspectual system underneath had already reorganized.

Why does my child use one form for everything?

Heritage speakers often keep only one member of an aspectual pair and use it for both meanings. It is a reorganized system rather than a gap, which is why correcting individual verbs rarely moves it.

What helps, if corrections do not?

Stories, read aloud, with the break heard rather than explained. The alternation between a long stretch and one completed action is the whole pattern, and folktales repeat it on every page.

Sources

• Laleko, O. (2010). On covert tense-aspect restructuring in heritage. In Proceedings of the 2009 Mind/Context Divide Workshop (pp. 72–83). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. lingref.com
• Mikhaylova, A. (2011). Interaction of aspectual morphology in L2 and heritage Russian. In Selected Proceedings of the 2010 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 63–77). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. lingref.com
• Polinsky, M. (2008). Without aspect. In G. G. Corbett & M. Noonan (Eds.), Case and Grammatical Relations: Studies in Honor of Bernard Comrie (Typological Studies in Language 81, pp. 263–282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi.org

Palme School: Conversation school · Russian for bilingual children · Free materials for learners

Lily Rozberg has been teaching for sixteen years, first English in Russia and now Russian to bilingual children across the US and Canada. She writes for Palme School about heritage language, reading, and the things report cards do not measure.